Home / A Defense of Legacy Admissions, The Surprising Engine of Meritocracy

A Defense of Legacy Admissions, The Surprising Engine of Meritocracy

Last week, California Gov. Newson signed legislation banning legacy and donor preferences for all private colleges in the state, including Stanford and USC. As justification, he triumphantly declared: “In California, everyone should be able to get ahead through merit, skill, and hard work.” Compelling reasoning indeed. Legacy is elitist. Legacy is unfair. Legacy is blatantly, on-its-face unmeritocratic. And…

Last week, California Gov. Newson signed legislation banning legacy and donor preferences for all private colleges in the state, including Stanford and USC. As justification, he triumphantly declared: “In California, everyone should be able to get ahead through merit, skill, and hard work.”

Get the best hand-picked news from our students and alumni straight to your inbox

Compelling reasoning indeed. Legacy is elitist. Legacy is unfair. Legacy is blatantly, on-its-face unmeritocratic.

And yet, legacy is a key engine of American meritocracy. For it furnishes the financial and social resources that integrate meritorious non-elites into the elite. Therefore, outlawing the practice is a monumental blunder, one that moves America towards a more unmeritocratic elite, a more unfair system, and a more dysfunctional society.

Continue reading original article

Related Articles

  • Mental Health Coverage at Tufts: Access, Limits, and the Question of Continuity

    • Tufts University
  • How Ben Sasse Is Living Now That He Is Dying

  • The Spectator Rejects a Two-Tiered Honor System

    • Washington and Lee University
Our community guidelines have been updated effective September 19
This is default text for notification bar